The Student Voice in Accreditation Processes

Authors

By 
Thivhavhudzi Muriel Badugela
Thivhavhudzi Muriel Badugela, University of Venda, South Africa
Orcid https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9122-5915

Thivhavhudzi Muriel Badugela, since joining the University of Venda, he has lectured in Sociology of Education and Curriculum Studies. Muriel attended National and international conferences, presenting papers. Muriel published book chapters and papers in peer-reviewed journals. Before joining the university, I taught at secondary schools for 28 years and worked as a Principal at Tshiluwi Primary School. Since 2018, Muriel has been a Lecturer, WIL Departmental co-ordinator and researcher at the Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education. Qualifications: STD-Makhado, B.A-Unisa, Bed Hons-Northwest, Med- Curriculum Studies Unisa, ACE- English, Technology Education -Unisa, Travel &Tourism -SACTE; PhD _Univen.

STAR SCHOLARS PRESS

Published

Publication date : September 3, 2026

Synopsis

This chapter examines the role of the student voice in accreditation processes, positioning students as key stakeholders in quality assurance and institutional accountability within higher education. It argues that while accreditation frameworks increasingly acknowledge student participation, the extent to which student voices have a meaningful influence on outcomes remains uneven and often symbolic. The chapter situates student involvement within broader shifts toward participatory governance, learner-centred education, and accountability-driven quality assurance regimes. The chapter explores how student voice is formally incorporated into accreditation through mechanisms such as surveys, focus groups, student representation on review panels, and institutional self-evaluation reports. It critically assesses the depth, inclusivity, and impact of these mechanisms, highlighting tensions between consultation and genuine co-creation. Particular attention is given to power asymmetries between students, institutions, and accrediting bodies, which can limit students’ capacity to shape standards, judgments, and recommendations. The chapter also considers the challenges of representation, including whose voices are heard, how diversity and marginalisation are addressed, and whether student participation reflects the full spectrum of learning experiences. In contexts marked by inequality, digital divides, or massification, student voice may be further constrained by structural and cultural barriers. Despite these challenges, the chapter demonstrates that when authentically integrated, student perspectives can enhance the relevance, credibility, and developmental value of accreditation processes. By reframing students not as passive respondents but as knowledgeable partners in quality assurance, this chapter calls for accreditation models that embed student voice more systematically and ethically. It advocates for capacity-building, transparency in feedback, and institutional cultures that value student insight as a core component of educational quality and continuous improvement.


Copyright