World University Rankings: Actors, Algorithms and Agendas
Published
Synopsis
World university rankings have become powerful governance instruments that shape higher education policy, institutional behaviour, and resource allocation globally. This chapter critically examines the key actors involved in producing and consuming rankings, the algorithmic methodologies that underpin ranking systems, and the various agendas that drive their proliferation and influence. Through analysis of major ranking organizations including Times Higher Education, QS, and Academic Ranking of World Universities, this study reveals how rankings reflect epistemological assumptions about quality and excellence while serving multiple stakeholder interests. The chapter demonstrates that ranking algorithms are not neutral technical tools but rather embody specific values and priorities that advantage certain institutional types and national systems. Furthermore, the chapter explores how rankings have created new forms of global competition, stratification, and isomorphism in higher education. Drawing on critical policy analysis and theoretical frameworks from the sociology of quantification, this chapter argues that understanding the interplay between actors, algorithms, and agendas is essential for developing more equitable and meaningful approaches to assessing university quality. The findings have significant implications for university leaders, policymakers, and researchers seeking to navigate the rankings landscape while maintaining institutional mission and diversity.