Flexible Internationalization in Times of Systemic Instability: A Conceptual Framework Beyond Mobility and Metrics
Published
Synopsis
Flexible Internationalization is proposed as a conceptual framework for sustaining credible internationalization under systemic instability. Rather than treating internationalization as an inventory of activities (mobility, recruitment, partnerships, or rankings-facing metrics), Flexible Internationalization reframes it as an institutional capability: the capacity to deliver international aims with integrity when the pathways to achieve them must change. The framework operationalizes reconfiguration readiness through four interrelated dimensions (modal, temporal, geographical, and governance) and foregrounds three tensions that institutions must manage explicitly: continuity vs. reconfiguration, performativity vs. mission coherence, and scalability vs. equity and academic labor sustainability. Flexible Internationalization contributes a “quality-with-flexibility” evaluative logic to make resilience-oriented internationalization legible in quality assurance and accreditation contexts, shifting assessment from activity counts to outcome continuity, auditability, reciprocity, and sustainable resourcing. The chapter offers criteria and evidence bundles to support institutional self-assessment and external review.