Flexible Internationalization in Times of Systemic Instability: A Conceptual Framework Beyond Mobility and Metrics

Authors

By 
Juan Manuel Castro Carracedo
Juan Manuel Castro Carracedo, Pontifical University of Salamanca, Spain
Orcid https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6745-0979

Juan Manuel Castro Carracedo is Full Professor in the Faculty of Education at the Pontifical University of Salamanca, Spain. His academic work focuses on teacher education, internationalisation of higher education, global competences in educational contexts, and the pedagogical implications of educational technology. He has served as Vice-Rector for Internationalisation and Student Affairs at his university. He leads and participates in research and innovation projects on 21st-century skills, Erasmus+ cooperation, and human-centred approaches to teaching and learning. His recent work addresses internationalisation in evolving contexts, the development of global competences and critical thinking, language education, and AI in higher education.

STAR SCHOLARS PRESS

Published

Publication date : August 9, 2026

Synopsis

Flexible Internationalization is proposed as a conceptual framework for sustaining credible internationalization under systemic instability. Rather than treating internationalization as an inventory of activities (mobility, recruitment, partnerships, or rankings-facing metrics), Flexible Internationalization reframes it as an institutional capability: the capacity to deliver international aims with integrity when the pathways to achieve them must change. The framework operationalizes reconfiguration readiness through four interrelated dimensions (modal, temporal, geographical, and governance) and foregrounds three tensions that institutions must manage explicitly: continuity vs. reconfiguration, performativity vs. mission coherence, and scalability vs. equity and academic labor sustainability. Flexible Internationalization contributes a “quality-with-flexibility” evaluative logic to make resilience-oriented internationalization legible in quality assurance and accreditation contexts, shifting assessment from activity counts to outcome continuity, auditability, reciprocity, and sustainable resourcing. The chapter offers criteria and evidence bundles to support institutional self-assessment and external review.


Copyright