Categories

Social Sciences

Faculty Roles in the Era of Smart Institutions

Authors

By 
Shu-Hua Chao
Shu-Hua Chao, Australian Catholic University, Australia
Orcid https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5372-2192

Shu Chao is a Lecturer at Australian Catholic University. Her teaching and research focus is on inclusive and ethical teacher education, digital pedagogy and student learning in Initial Teacher Education (ITE). She has led curriculum innovations that enhance assessment design, student engagement and reflective practice. Her research explores ethics education, equity and digital learning. Shu is currently leading a study on pre- and in-service teachers’ understanding and perceptions of ethics. She also supports research capacity building through mentoring and interdisciplinary collaboration.

Wendy M. Goff
Wendy M. Goff, Australian Catholic University, Australia
Orcid https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0665-2793

Wendy M Goff is the Acting State Head of School (Victoria) at the National School of Education at Australian Catholic University. Wendy's research explores the dynamics of relationships and partnerships and how they shape learning, health, and wellbeing. She uses five key vehicles to study the impact and influence of these relationships and partnerships (mathematics education; technology; early childhood education; higher education; and health and wellbeing). Wendy is the Oceania Governor for the International Alliance of Health, Physical Education, Dance and Sport. She has disseminated her research through presentations and publications on both national and international platforms.

STAR SCHOLARS PRESS

Published

Publication date : August 9, 2026

Synopsis

Traditional faculty roles as “transmitters of knowledge” are undergoing a fundamental shift toward becoming mediators and network navigators within the emerging paradigm of smart institutions. This evolution is driven by the “smartization process”, which integrates Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT) into daily academic operations. While technology automates routine administrative burdens, it necessitates a new focus on “interwoven intelligence”, where faculty provide critical supervision of AI outputs and safeguard academic integrity against risks like “AIgiarism”. However, this transition introduces professional friction, including “technostress”, “digital bureaucracy” and the potential “deprofessionalisation” of academic labour. To navigate these challenges, in this chapter we propose that a “hybrid mentoring” model could serve as a possible approach to assist in synthesising AI-driven efficiency with the relational depth of human empathy. Successful integration requires institutional support through bottom-up governance, comprehensive AI literacy, and workload models that officially recognise the “invisible” digital design and maintenance. Ultimately, the faculty role in smart institutions must balance technological precision with the essential human touch to ensure education remains a process of interpersonal understanding.


Copyright